Sunday, October 27, 2013

Week 4

I always amazes me how far along we have come in the medical field at this point in time.  With all of the machinery that performs MRI’s and CAT scans and X-rays and the ability those have to display images of internal structures.  What is even more amazing is that machines like that were invented over 200 years ago, way before a car was even invented.  I have had my own experience of all of those scans; x-ray, mri, and cat scans.  I must say those have really helped me achieve the health I posses today. 

A CAT scan has the ability to show much detail in any picture.

 
The first x-ray machine vs an x-ray machine now.


In talk about plastic surgery, one group I find to be very helpful is actually one through UCLA called Operation Mend.  It is an organization that treats war victims who may have lost a limb or had serious burns to their skin.  These heroes are risking their lives to go to war for our protection and are severely hurt, and I think this is a great way to help them out, because they are so thankful for the help and opportunity that they still have their lives.  This program is available for individuals who may have been born with facial disfigurement from burn or other serious matters.  I find it awesome that my own school can be apart of such a great foundation.  Operation Mend how face transplants work



I have always found it fascinating how long an MRI takes compared to a CAT scan when a CAT scan is usually more effective in showing higher quality.  Here is a link to show all the qualities an MRI and CAT scan posses. CT scan vs MRI






Works Cited

Cat Scan. N.d. Photograph. n.p. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/beyond/articles/medicine/cat_scan.gif>. 

Crookes Tube X-Ray. N.d. Photograph. n.p. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Crookes_tube_xray_experiment.jpg>.

"CT Scan vs MRI." Compare Anything . N.p.. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://www.diffen.com/difference/CT_Scan_vs_MRI>.

Mobile X-Ray Machine. N.d. Photograph. n.p. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Mobile_X-ray_machine.jpg>.

Operation Mend. N.d. Photograph. n.p. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://www.health.mil/Libraries/Featured_Story_Images/Op_Mend_1st_SlideFEAT.jpg?decreaseOnly=true&width=332&height=200>.

"UCLA Face Transplantation Program." n.pag. Web. 27 Oct 2013. <http://transplants.ucla.edu/body.cfm?id=35>.


2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found your link to the "CT Scan vs MRI" very interesting. Looking more closely at the comparison information I found out that although Ct's take faster and better pictures, a single CT scan exposes you to 2 to 10 mSv radiation which is equivalent to 3 – 5 years of background radiation that an average person acquires. MRI, on the other hand, is harmless.
    I worked as a Radiology Transporter in a hospital before yet didn’t know this fact myself until today; just felt like informing you on why some people choose to spend an extra 25minutes getting an MRI instead of a CT Scan.

    ReplyDelete